Re:Google will pay SpaceX $920M per month for compute
by l23k4 on Sunday June 07, 2026 @01:58AM
(#48432251)
>Following the rules of passive indexes is the whole point.
The whole point of these indices is to represent the market, the rules are unsustainable if they cause too big of a divergence from that goal.
> The blatantly corrupt move to change the rules
Why do you think nobody in the financial press is reporting on this blatant corruption? Is it because this conspiracy also includes all of the news media?
Re:Google will pay SpaceX $920M per month for compute
by matwood on Sunday June 07, 2026 @03:02AM
(#48432560)
There’s too much anti AI/Elon emotion to have discussions around this issue at this point. HN is usually pretty good about rational discussions, but AI has really triggered people on both sides.
For example, yesterday I posted a link to the Nasdaq faq about the change, and my comment was flagged hah!
Re:Google will pay SpaceX $920M per month for compute
by l23k4 on Sunday June 07, 2026 @05:01AM
(#48433103)
Yep, almost all of my comments questioning this conspiracy theory have been flagged, with many being set [dead] by them moderators.
Following the rules of passive indexes is the whole point.
Mēh! The passive indexes (biased to a momentum strategy, so not really passive - they are too big) may have had their day. The blatantly corrupt move to change the rules was clearly an attempt to game them, and even with out the rule change they will squeeze themselves through the rule gate with financial engineering
This will always be the trend in finance, the powerful manipulate the system to their benefit, the rest of us do what we can to survive....