News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by dang on Friday June 05, 2026 @02:35PM (#48416447)
Comments like this do more of what they complain about, only with an extra layer of judgment.

It would be preferable if someone would seed a better discussion by engaging with the article's claims/observations.

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by ex-aws-dude on Friday June 05, 2026 @03:44PM (#48417227)
Why did you the admin allow such ragebait to stay on the front page then?

Is that the kind of low effort posts we want around here? Just a link to a github comment of a screenshot?

You're complicit here in fueling the harassment of an open source project

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by dang on Friday June 05, 2026 @03:53PM (#48417336)
I don't have enough background info to understand what you're referring to here.

Even if you're right, though, you shouldn't be posting comments that break the site guidelines.

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by ex-aws-dude on Friday June 05, 2026 @08:40PM (#48420191)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342705

People opening issues just to rant against an open source project is acceptable content for HN?

How is that even allowed in the first place without getting flagged/removed?

And every time that happens the project gets brigaded from HN users

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by dang on Friday June 05, 2026 @11:18PM (#48421051)
People have been ranting for, against, and about open source projects since open source began.

Please follow the site guidelines from now on.

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by ex-aws-dude on Saturday June 06, 2026 @01:29AM (#48421693)
This ain’t a rant it’s literally a screenshot of a mastodon tweet posted on an issue page

How does low effort rage-bait spark curiosity?

The comment to upvote ratio clearly shows it’s inflammatory