Re:Codex just found a "workaround" of not having sudo on my PC
by fpoling on Sunday May 31, 2026 @03:55PM
(#48349143)
User namespaces significantly rise the risk of exploits and many setups disable them. One may argue that Docker should have used them when they were available, but that would break too many useful setups involving privileged containers.
Re:Codex just found a "workaround" of not having sudo on my PC
by worik on Sunday May 31, 2026 @05:56PM
(#48350138)
> User namespaces significantly rise the risk of exploits
How?
Re:Codex just found a "workaround" of not having sudo on my PC
by tominous on Sunday May 31, 2026 @10:11PM
(#48351912)
Here's one (CIFSwitch) from a couple of days ago:
https://heyitsas.im/posts/cifswitch/
Re:Codex just found a "workaround" of not having sudo on my PC
by LtWorf on Monday June 01, 2026 @01:22AM
(#48352918)
Ah of course, we should not use userns because it might be vulnerable to some yet to be discovered vulnerability. The better alternative is to give full root access so we won't have surprises.
Weak that this isn't the default.