Re:California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verificatio...
by kelseyfrog on Monday May 25, 2026 @04:40PM
(#48271436)
If one kid is able to bypass the system it means it's zero percent effective. Same thing with alcohol, and cigarettes. Especially if it means I have to show my ID to buy those things.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verificatio...
by JumpCrisscross on Monday May 25, 2026 @07:20PM
(#48273015)
> If one kid is able to bypass the system it means it's zero percent effective
No. Like, obviously no. That’s not how effectiveness is ever measured.
Re:California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verificatio...
by smelendez on Monday May 25, 2026 @05:07PM
(#48271683)
It feels more complicated.
Some kids getting access to booze here and there with planning and coordination is different from kids walking into a liquor store or bar whenever they want.
Re:California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verificatio...
by kelseyfrog on Monday May 25, 2026 @05:15PM
(#48271765)
It's literally all or nothing[1]. Either measures are 100 percent effective or they are completely broken and should not exist.
Re:California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verificatio...
by ziml77 on Monday May 25, 2026 @07:28PM
(#48273085)
Shit thanks for pointing that out. My door lock isn't 100% effective at stopping thieves, so I guess I can get rid of that annoying thing. Will be nice to never worry about being locked out again!
Re:California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verificatio...
by dijksterhuis on Monday May 25, 2026 @05:36PM
(#48271950)
are you… are you /s-ing right now? it’s unclear to me whether you’re being satirical/sarcastic or not and i want to check before i point out a thing.