Re:Microsoft open-sources "the earliest DOS source code disc...
by ramon156 on Sunday May 24, 2026 @04:21AM
(#48255548)
I dont think I've ever seen a commit that says "49 years ago". Damn.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft open-sources "the earliest DOS source code disc...
by formerly_proven on Sunday May 24, 2026 @04:54AM
(#48255701)
Re:Microsoft open-sources "the earliest DOS source code disc...
by zymhan on Sunday May 24, 2026 @10:24PM
(#48262875)
I was confused by the short commit history, and then I checked the branches.
I love that someone went to this effort.
Re:Microsoft open-sources "the earliest DOS source code disc...
by RobotToaster on Sunday May 24, 2026 @12:43PM
(#48258811)
Not quite as old, but brl-cad is still in active development and has commits from 1983. https://github.com/BRL-CAD/brlcad/graphs/contributors?all=1
Re:Microsoft open-sources "the earliest DOS source code disc...
by mapM on Sunday May 24, 2026 @10:58PM
(#48263024)
It's funny that the .gitignore is marked as being from 49 years ago ...
Re:Microsoft open-sources "the earliest DOS source code disc...
by nextaccountic on Monday May 25, 2026 @02:09AM
(#48263908)
Even the README here is (erroneously?) timestamped as 1978 https://github.com/microsoft/BASIC-M6502
Which is unlikely since it seems to be written by AI
Re:Microsoft open-sources "the earliest DOS source code disc...
by chungy on Monday May 25, 2026 @06:05AM
(#48265179)
Files in Git don't have timestamps, only commits do. It got swept up when `git commit --date=...` was run.
Re:Microsoft open-sources "the earliest DOS source code disc...
by nextaccountic on Monday May 25, 2026 @07:07AM
(#48265521)
oh I see. proper archeology would be to have more commits then