News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Art of Money Getting by lelanthran on Saturday May 23, 2026 @05:17PM (#48251615)
> I like building stuff. I don't care about the code.

Sounds like you like having stuff, not building stuff.

Re:The Art of Money Getting by triprjt on Saturday May 23, 2026 @05:59PM (#48251973)
i think he meant having stuff that he brought to life
Re:The Art of Money Getting by coliveira on Saturday May 23, 2026 @11:48PM (#48254185)
But he didn't, it was given to him by AI.
Re:The Art of Money Getting by tasuki on Sunday May 24, 2026 @12:42PM (#48258805)
If he was constraining the AI's output, his input was meaningful.

Did you ever bring anything to life? Whatever it is, you are also relying on the work others have done before you and standing on the shoulders of giants.

Re:The Art of Money Getting by sebastiennight on Sunday May 24, 2026 @02:36PM (#48259841)
I'd say many fathers are pretty happy "having kids given to them by a woman" (to use your terminology).

It seems you wouldn't give them credit for it, but most of them appear to feel quite a bit of responsibility for bringing those to life.

Re:The Art of Money Getting by coliveira on Sunday May 24, 2026 @03:23PM (#48260225)
A woman is a human being. An AI is a machine.
Re:The Art of Money Getting by sebastiennight on Sunday May 24, 2026 @07:32PM (#48262077)
Which makes your point make less sense?

I plant a seed, a human being carries it to fruition for 9 months through her determination, love and literal life blood, and I can claim I brought the seed to life.

He plants an idea and patiently coaxes a machine to spit out the code that matches it, you're giving the machine the credit.

I don't get it.

Re:The Art of Money Getting by SoftTalker on Sunday May 24, 2026 @12:53PM (#48258905)
It's all a matter of what you have added.

A carpenter can build a house with commercially produced dimensional lumber without having to harvest the trees, cut them into boards of standard dimensions, kiln-dry it, and transport it to the building site. We still say he "built" the house.

At some point, though, it's fair to ask "what did I add?"

If you are directing other people (or maybe robots, someday) to do the actual building, you can't really claim to have "built a house" even though it all happened under your direction.

I guess bottom line for me to feel I had a real part in "building" a thing would be whether I added anything I am specifically qualified or skilled at doing, or did I do what anyone could have done?