Re:The Art of Money Getting
by coliveira on Saturday May 23, 2026 @11:48PM
(#48254185)
But he didn't, it was given to him by AI.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If he was constraining the AI's output, his input was meaningful.
Did you ever bring anything to life? Whatever it is, you are also relying on the work others have done before you and standing on the shoulders of giants.
Re:The Art of Money Getting
by sebastiennight on Sunday May 24, 2026 @02:36PM
(#48259841)
I'd say many fathers are pretty happy "having kids given to them by a woman" (to use your terminology).
It seems you wouldn't give them credit for it, but most of them appear to feel quite a bit of responsibility for bringing those to life.
A woman is a human being. An AI is a machine.
Re:The Art of Money Getting
by sebastiennight on Sunday May 24, 2026 @07:32PM
(#48262077)
Which makes your point make less sense?
I plant a seed, a human being carries it to fruition for 9 months through her determination, love and literal life blood, and I can claim I brought the seed to life.
He plants an idea and patiently coaxes a machine to spit out the code that matches it, you're giving the machine the credit.
I don't get it.