Introducing GNU Guix

Re:Introducing GNU Guix by __david__ on Friday November 23, 2012 @12:13PM (#4822872)

While you're not necessarily wrong, "ego" gives off a pretty negative vibe. I would say it's quite often personal dissatisfaction of the status quo.

I support what they are doing. Wheels sometimes get better when they are reinvented.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing GNU Guix by mseebach on Friday November 23, 2012 @04:14PM (#4823698)

I'm not one to declare other people's motivation, but it strikes me as very odd that there isn't a "So, here's what's irreparably wrong with dpkg/apt and rpm/yum".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing GNU Guix by zem on Friday November 23, 2012 @08:06PM (#4824218)

it's fixing a (real or perceived) problem with nix, not with dpkg or rpm.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing GNU Guix by mseebach on Saturday November 24, 2012 @07:20AM (#4825171)

Well, there isn't a "So, here's what's wrong with nix" either.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing GNU Guix by zem on Sunday November 25, 2012 @06:30AM (#4827905)

there kind of is, if you read between the lines - their usp is the scheme interface, which provides a "proper" programming language with which to interact with the packaging system. they don't explicitly call that out as something wrong with nix, but it's clearly what they feel they do better.

[ Parent | on HN ]