News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing GNU Guix by benihana on Friday November 23, 2012 @09:23AM (#4822285)
Usually when there is no clear answer to this in a FOSS project, I think it's safe to assume the answer is ego.
Re:Introducing GNU Guix by __david__ on Friday November 23, 2012 @12:13PM (#4822872)
While you're not necessarily wrong, "ego" gives off a pretty negative vibe. I would say it's quite often personal dissatisfaction of the status quo.

I support what they are doing. Wheels sometimes get better when they are reinvented.

Re:Introducing GNU Guix by mseebach on Friday November 23, 2012 @04:14PM (#4823698)
I'm not one to declare other people's motivation, but it strikes me as very odd that there isn't a "So, here's what's irreparably wrong with dpkg/apt and rpm/yum".
Re:Introducing GNU Guix by zem on Friday November 23, 2012 @08:06PM (#4824218)
it's fixing a (real or perceived) problem with nix, not with dpkg or rpm.
Re:Introducing GNU Guix by mseebach on Saturday November 24, 2012 @07:20AM (#4825171)
Well, there isn't a "So, here's what's wrong with nix" either.
Re:Introducing GNU Guix by zem on Sunday November 25, 2012 @06:30AM (#4827905)
there kind of is, if you read between the lines - their usp is the scheme interface, which provides a "proper" programming language with which to interact with the packaging system. they don't explicitly call that out as something wrong with nix, but it's clearly what they feel they do better.
Re:Introducing GNU Guix by rhizome on Friday November 23, 2012 @03:12PM (#4823499)
What relation would you say ego has to scratching one's own itch?
Re:Introducing GNU Guix by michaelhoffman on Saturday November 24, 2012 @12:06AM (#4824597)
I think the concepts are intertwined, if you are going to scratch your own itch and then release it for the rest of the world to scratch theirs.

"We will encourage you to develop the three great virtues of a programmer: laziness, impatience, and hubris." — Larry Wall