Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis...
by fourseventy on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @10:45PM
(#48217212)
What is the last model you used... lol. Linus Torvalds himself said the newest models are better than him at coding.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis...
by stemchar on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @11:36PM
(#48217574)
This doesn't sound correct. Source?
Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis...
by no-name-here on Thursday May 21, 2026 @01:06AM
(#48218105)
In recent months, Linus said it specifically about code for a personal side project of his. The quote was in the commit message. (I’m not the grandparent commenter, and I think grandparent commenter’s claims may be too broad or require context.)
Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis...
by yrds96 on Thursday May 21, 2026 @03:24AM
(#48219073)
There are a missing the context: The vibecoded application was written in python while the main code was written manually in C by Torvalds in this side project. He never ever said that AI produces better code than him in the language where he is proficientI.
Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis...
by helloplanets on Thursday May 21, 2026 @03:41AM
(#48219178)
https://github.com/torvalds/AudioNoise
> The python visualizer tool has been basically written by vibe-coding. I know more about analog filters -- and that's not saying much -- than I do about python. It started out as my typical "google and do the monkey-see-monkey-do" kind of programming, but then I cut out the middle-man -- me -- and just used Google Antigravity to do the audio sample visualizer.