>This article is about statistics and government policy. For Nazi analogies in internet discussions, see Godwin's law.

I don’t.

Things that rhyme with this have indeed been happening at the biggest names.

I call AI on this comment

why?

Imitating your own utter lack of explanation or evidence?

I have seen similar at my company so it is highly plausible.

If you've never seen this level of perverse incentive, you have been lucky. The creation of and subsequent exploitation of them aren't new. For pre computer examples: https://freakonomics.com/podcast/the-cobra-effect-2/

I can't find the reference right now, but I remember reading literature about studies done at large programming organizations (like IBM, government) who used LOCs as a performance metric. Programmers could earn more money by including more lines of code in their work. This went exactly the way you'd expect.

Edit: I think it may have been from Capers Jones's _Programming Productivity_[1]. Published in 1986, based on research covering the prior 30 years(!) or so. We have known that bad incentives specifically distort the performance of programming teams for a long time.

1 - https://archive.org/details/programmingprodu0000jone/page/n1...

And then there was Bill Atkinson.

https://www.folklore.org/Negative_2000_Lines_Of_Code.html

While it is good story for illustrating perverse incentives, there is no good historical evidence that the cobra bounty program actually existed.

The worse example I know is the time the Belgians forced the Congolese to harvest more rubber by cutting their hands if they haven't reached the correct quota, ensuing a cross-tribe hands trading economy

> cross-tribe hands trading

sounds like they had some cross cutting concerns

</dad>

Belgians had nothing to do with that, nor the then governement

The king had a side biz

Similar to the British in India, it was first controlled by some kind of company that benefitted the host country by extracting resources, and later on the host country took control. Belgium took control of Congo in 1908

It was literally the king that wanted it as personal venture. Belgium took over because he was very/too bad ( you're right that the governement was involved, I stand corrected).

Healthcare and infrastructure was then build too, but the relation was already scarred and well, it's not easy to reset everything.

I call unintended consequences on this KPI culture

They polished the turd more than stating, but the bones are real.