Re:Gyroflow: Video stabilization using gyroscope data
by _flux on Friday May 15, 2026 @05:13AM
(#48146329)
I think gyroscopic data still can have the edge if it has higher sampling rate than the video: then it could be used for removing blur from individual frames.
I also expect purely gyroscopic approach to be much lighter compute-wise.
Re:Gyroflow: Video stabilization using gyroscope data
by 7e on Friday May 15, 2026 @07:17PM
(#48155173)
I expect you can recover most if not all of the gyroscopic data even from a blurred image, possibly at higher accuracy.
Re:Gyroflow: Video stabilization using gyroscope data
by _flux on Saturday May 16, 2026 @05:22AM
(#48158454)
I actually don't think that's possible, if you assume the objects in the video can also shake and the intent is to eliminate only the camera shaking.
Re:Gyroflow: Video stabilization using gyroscope data
by UltraSane on Friday May 15, 2026 @01:12PM
(#48151188)
gyroscope data is much higher time resolution and is the ground truth vs guessing motion from pixel.
Re:Gyroflow: Video stabilization using gyroscope data
by mikae1 on Friday May 15, 2026 @03:06PM
(#48152541)
In my experience, what you call vision-based systems don't even come close to Gyroflow. After I started using Gyroflow I haven't touched the Ronin gimbal many times.
Re:Gyroflow: Video stabilization using gyroscope data
by 7e on Friday May 15, 2026 @07:15PM
(#48155171)
A physical stabilizer like the Ronin is not what they mean. They mean vision based approaches which should be more accurate.
Re:Gyroflow: Video stabilization using gyroscope data
by Gigachad on Friday May 15, 2026 @09:54PM
(#48156090)
It doesn’t seem obvious that vision based stabilisation would be more accurate than a high accuracy gyroscope of the actual motion.
At any rate if gyroflow obsoletes an actual gimbal it’s pretty close to perfect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-m3fwhx3Z5g