Yeah, that caught me off guard as well. Is it supposed to be a plot twist revealing the article is written/elongated with AI assistance? Didn’t immediately feel that way upon first reading, but who knows anymore.
Re:Appearing productive in the workplace
by mistersquid on Thursday May 07, 2026 @08:29AM
(#48048572)
> > Also, those that claimed this article is ironically a casualty of it’s own complaint are 100% right, Kudos.
> Why would the article be a casualty of its own complaint?
The "Disclaimer" section was added after the initial publication according to the Wayback Machine.[0]
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20260506162056/https://nooneshap...
> Also, those that claimed this article is ironically a casualty of it’s own complaint are 100% right, Kudos.
Why would the article be a casualty of its own complaint?