This issue is inherently unfixable by ANY password manager, because the process model of the underlying OS isn't itself secure. No obfuscation will work, because the password manager itself needs to de-obfuscation it before use (and that memory too is dump-able).

All adding in-memory obfuscation does it make ignorant people feel better, while not moving the security needle even an inch.

Usually the confidential bits are hardware isolated away from the supervisor (host kernel/OS) in Enclaves, Realms, TEEs, Secure Elements, Security chips, etc.

I've seen orgs move to passkeys only, then offer reset-questions (e.g. city of first job, etc); because the Customer Service volume/workflow wasn't figured out.

Or your backpack gets stolen.

Oops.

I swear, people who idolize passkey security must never travel anywhere.

PS: "just have more devices with passkeys", they invariably say.

Yeah right because people are made of money, everyone has the forethought, and a 2nd laptop in the US is a great asset when you're in Poland and can't login anywhere.

About every week now Amazon tries to trick me into creating a passkey. It doesn't even ask, it just goes ahead and triggers my browser passkey creation mechanism without my consent. PayPal recently tried to force me to create one too and I had to kill and restart the app because that was the only way to skip it. I'll stick to my password with 2FA, thanks.

And if you take the nuclear option and strip your browser of WebAuthn support, then you obviously can't use any passkeys, which doesn't work for me - I have two sites where I do want to use passkeys (because it's the only way to avoid SMS-based MFA on every login), but I never want to see passkey prompts for any other sites.

I’ll be honest I’ve heard a lot of griping about passkeys but I have gone out of my way to switch over to them and have had precisely zero issues over the dozens of sites that I’ve bothered to make the switch on. Login flow is simpler and doesn’t rely on a browser extension guessing at login fields or trying to figure out when passwords change.

Sometimes the new thing really is just better.

Yeah right.

When passkeys were rolled out, I was told it's OK because "passwords are always going to be required to be an available alternative".

Now we've moved the goalposts to "it's just one website".

>Sometimes the new thing really is just better.

And sometimes your backpack is stolen when you're traveling, with your phone and laptop (happened to me in Poland), and you need to log into your accounts while having none of your devices or your phone number available.

Pray tell then what.

If passkeys are significantly better, passwords will gradually stop existing. If passwords are, passkeys probably won’t catch on.

> And sometimes your backpack is stolen when you're traveling, with your phone and laptop (happened to me in Poland), and you need to log into your accounts while having none of your devices or your phone number available.

I personally keep a separate YubiKey that—along with a memorized password—is sufficient for me to retrieve my password manager database and unlock it. If this is a sufficiently motivating use-case for you, you too can take these kinds of steps to mitigate the risk.

But since we’re playing the “what if” game, what happens if you get early onset dementia and forget your passwords? Pray tell then what?

So, your solution is passwords with extra steps.

Thanks but no thanks.

>I personally keep a separate YubiKey that—along with a memorized password—is sufficient for me to retrieve my password manager database and unlock it.

So, basically, having to create and maintain a backup device to keep separately from my laptop/phone in case they get stolen, make sure I don't lose it, but carry it with me everywhere like a crucifix.

That, and still having to remember and use a password, because otherwise the thieves get control of everything once they steal my device.

Sure. That's not objectively better than passwords which don't require this sort of hassle.

At the very least because it still requires a password.

>you too can take these kinds of steps to mitigate the risk.

OK. I can. I don't want to have to do these kind of steps, or any other dance to mitigate the real risks that passwords already protect me from.

Passkeys mitigate risks which I don't run into (”what if someone learns my password?”), while introducing others.

They are a convenience for people who run the system because they off-load those risks onto users.

>But since we’re playing the “what if” game

You're playing games with contrived hypotheticals.

I've had my laptop, phone, and wallet stolen on an overseas trip.

>what happens if you [...] forget your passwords?

I click the "forgot your password?" link which every website that uses passwords has.

Having a notebook in a vault with passwords also solves this problem.

I don't get a sudden onset of dementia which causes amnesia when I travel.

But I've lost my devices and had them stolen from me overseas.

It was a big enough hassle even though I did have the passwords.

Having only one device that has authority to log into your accounts is obviously not a good security model.

Me giving an example of one major website (actually, I gave two) is all that is needed to disprove your claim. I could provide plenty more examples of major websites asking me to, but I don't need to. I could provide plenty of examples of people telling people to "redo everything" with passkeys, but your own comment is literally advocating the same thing...

Please don't mischaracterize the conversation that is plainly visible for all to see. Just accept that you tried to suggest that nobody is asking users to switch to passkeys, and you were wrong. It seems like your error is that you just haven't been seeing it personally, since you switched on your own before the nagging started, and so you weren't aware of it. Well, now you are.

> Nobody is asking you to?

Nobody is in fact asking you to change everything.

Why you are trying to claim the opposite is beyond me.

Given that in order to access your password manager's vault often requires 2-factor (or should at least) it's a level of security that I am comfortable with.

I take it a step further and host the password manager vault within my home network. My home network does not expose anything publicly except a WireGuard port, it's completely locked down. I have to VPN in to access the vault.

It takes a bit of effort, but it’s not impossible.

Yes, it means that in the event of catastrophic failure I might not be able to log in to some services until I get to one of the backups. I haven’t been able to imagine a scenario where that would be truly problematic.

That's a wild understatement. For most users, having a password manager is already very near to the upper bound of acceptable friction.

No need to imagine!

Remove all passkeys from your phone and laptop, then go somewhere overseas without any of those Yubikeys.

Have fun enjoy a "not truly problematic" scenario of getting your Yibikeys from "multiple locations" you don't have access to, while being cut off from your messengers, email, bank account, etc.

Bonus points for having your card locked or stolen at the same time.

Or, imagine the backpack with your passkeys devices being stolen on an overseas trip.

Again: pray tell, then what?

I don't have any passkeys on my phone or laptop. They're all on the Yubikeys.

I don't really see a difference with (some) password managers, though. If you use one of the keepasses, and you lose access to the file, you're in the same situation right?

And yeah, you're right, there is a risk of inconvenience. I'm not debating that. I just choose to organise my life in such a way that it is just an inconvenience.

It's literally at https://github.com/Joker-vD/keepassdb/raw/refs/heads/master/... in my case, plus a couple of other free hosting sites that support easy updates/reuploads, so losing access to it requires losing access to Internet — in which case you don't really need any (alright, most) of your passwords because you need Internet to connect to the services that require those passwords.

If I remember correctly, 1Password still requires a "vault key" in addition to your username and password, and it was definitely too long and not used often enough for me to remember.

Confirms that strategy then

For people who only use passwords having an extra device can help too. Google does not necessarily permit a login with a backup code, so to me it seems ideal to grab a spare phone, log into important accounts, and store it with a trusted party/friend.

It could be very difficult to login to an account like Gmail from overseas in the event of PC+phone[+hardware key] theft. Maybe no big deal if you can port your number to a new phone right away. Or maybe the trusted friend can help (unless Google still finds the login suspicious after all, no idea there)

Literally happened to me in Poland, which is why I avoid passkeys like the plague.

(The thief got caught months later. That didn't help me.)

>Maybe no big deal if you can port your number to a new phone right away.

T-Mobile won't mail a SIM card overseas, and I doubt others will either. There is no "maybe", it's a certainty that you won't be able to.

>Or maybe the trusted friend can help

Yeah, my wife literally mailed me SIM card to Poland.

It took over week.

And a "trusted friend" would first have had to get it somehow.

>Or maybe the trusted friend can help (unless Google still finds the login suspicious after all, no idea there)

At least I logged into my accounts from that city before the laptop and phone were stolen, so my logins were not "suspicious".

That's with a password.

_____

PS: screw Citibank's mandatory phone -based "2FA".

Edit: and near 0 customer support too

Thank you, then this is still true today?

Disappointing the rollout was botched (recall cross platform and password manager difficulties). Haven’t done research since but even with some new UIs and flows promoting passkeys in the past couple months, haven’t regained my trust either.

Updated to Windows Hello and passkey.

Now I can use a 4 digit pin to login.

A lot of services have password reset email features. If the email account has passkey you're screwed. But restore by snail mail can be possible but slow (for paid services). More secure? Don't know but same category of problems already known due to sim swapping attacks in mobile sector. But for sure the Mail account is a high value target.

Storing passkeys in a database may be possible but complex to do it right e.g. backup verification, avoiding to leak while backup etc.

Banking has no selfservice password reset. A lot of work for customer support due to identification. Nobody wants to do that for free and if the accounts are freenyou may get DOSed by bots which trigger passwort resets.