Re:DeepSeek V4–almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price
by sanex on Saturday May 02, 2026 @11:10AM
(#47987085)
We need that lawsuit to happen already so we can establish precedent. The person in the driver's seat of the Tesla should be at fault. The engineer using the llm should be at fault. The person behind the gun not the manufacturer should be at fault.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:DeepSeek V4–almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price
by hvb2 on Saturday May 02, 2026 @12:04PM
(#47987590)
> The person in the driver's seat of the Tesla should be at fault.
I don't think this is a good analogy. For Tesla right now it might fly. However, when their software gets to waymo level of autonomy, I would expect liability to shift to the manufacturer.
If anything, I think that would be the true proof of a company trusting their software to allow for autonomous driving
Re:DeepSeek V4–almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price
by rokob on Saturday May 02, 2026 @04:05PM
(#47989953)
> However, when their software gets to waymo level of autonomy
Luckily that won’t happen.
Re:DeepSeek V4–almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price
by dotancohen on Sunday May 03, 2026 @02:41AM
(#47994050)
I believe that Mercedes does offer manufacturer liability.
Re:DeepSeek V4–almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price
by kelvinjps10 on Sunday May 03, 2026 @07:13PM
(#48002617)
Also especially if they claim they're selling autonomous cars
Re:DeepSeek V4–almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price
by Iolaum on Saturday May 02, 2026 @11:33AM
(#47987296)
We shouldn't need a lawsuit. The legislative branch should pass a law clarifying those things, that's their job.
Re:DeepSeek V4–almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price
by jon_richards on Saturday May 02, 2026 @10:08PM
(#47992635)
Then you need a lawsuit to determine whether the law is “constitutional”.
Re:DeepSeek V4–almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price
by missedthecue on Saturday May 02, 2026 @01:08PM
(#47988243)
In the America, whoever has the most money is liable. It's not worth it for the legal industry otherwise. The lawyer earns his pay by convincing the court that whatever established precedent doesn't apply to his case.