News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by steve1977 on Friday May 01, 2026 @03:39AM (#47972179)
> a notification should have gone out from the kernel team to a curated list of distro security folk

Who would curate that list though? You don't need permission from the kernel team to spin up a new distro. I can go and create fork of Debian or Arch or whatever today and the kernel team would never know (and neither should they).

This is completely in the responsibility of the distros. If you don't like this model, use something like FreeBSD.

Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by mort96 on Friday May 01, 2026 @03:46AM (#47972228)
Sounds like a job for the Linux Foundation maybe?

You don't need anyone's permission to make a distro, that's true, but if you notify Debian, Canonical, Fedora, Red Hat and Arch you're covering a very large fraction of users; way more than today's 0%. In cases like this, perfect is the enemy of the good.

Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by dotancohen on Friday May 01, 2026 @04:36AM (#47972483)
A rogue actor may create a new distro, maybe for some niche use case such as accessibility or retro gaming. After acquiring enough false (and even some real) users that the Linux Foundation accepts them as a notifiable distro maintainer, this maintainer could then pwn machines before the exploit is made public.
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by mort96 on Friday May 01, 2026 @04:44AM (#47972515)
I didn't say all distros should be notified, for that exact reason. I listed a handful of major fistros.
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by steve1977 on Friday May 01, 2026 @04:56AM (#47972583)
Who gets to decide who the lucky few are?
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by mort96 on Friday May 01, 2026 @05:38AM (#47972802)
Sounds like a job for the Linux Foundation maybe?
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by lillecarl on Friday May 01, 2026 @05:22AM (#47972719)
Human beings
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by steve1977 on Friday May 01, 2026 @05:34AM (#47972786)
Qualified by what?
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by Dylan16807 on Friday May 01, 2026 @09:13AM (#47974424)
Are you implying it requires expertise to figure out the ten (plus or minus a factor of two) biggest distros? I think most people that understand the context of the question can figure out pretty similar lists.
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by danlitt on Friday May 01, 2026 @04:40AM (#47972503)
Rather than the current situation, where they can pwn machines after the exploit is made public?
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by dotancohen on Friday May 01, 2026 @06:11AM (#47973003)
Yes. After the exploit is made public, the window of opportunity closes quickly.
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by danlitt on Friday May 01, 2026 @10:22AM (#47975144)
Not if people don't get notified!
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by DarkUranium on Friday May 01, 2026 @08:56AM (#47974245)
The Linux Foundation hasn't been about Linux (except marginally) in a long while, if ever.

The name is a misnomer.

Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by aragilar on Friday May 01, 2026 @04:31AM (#47972461)
Uh, there is a list, named "linux-distros", which is for this purpose (and I think it's for more than just Linux, e.g. I believe it was used for the xz vuln).

Given this was announced when backports weren't ready (and given the POC was at least opaque if not obfuscated), I'm getting the vibe fixing the vuln wasn't as high as a priority as making a media splash.

Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by j16sdiz on Friday May 01, 2026 @07:35AM (#47973577)
From TFA:

> Note that for Linux kernel vulnerabilities, unless the reporter chooses > to bring it to the linux-distros ML, there is no heads-up to > distributions.

so, no, `linux-distros` list don't solve the problem.

Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by jamespo on Friday May 01, 2026 @04:57AM (#47972596)
The impacted user count of your debian fork with custom compiled kernel would probably not be more than 1 however.