News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by spankalee on Sunday April 26, 2026 @04:10PM (#47913751)
Blocking the right car lane for a drop off is perfectly legal outside of No Stopping zones. This is how taxis have always worked.

It's just that other drivers get pissed off if you block a car lane when there's a bike lane next to it. That needs to be trained away by enforcing the rules.

Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by SR2Z on Sunday April 26, 2026 @04:24PM (#47913934)
That needs to be trained away by physically separating bike lanes from car lanes. Drivers (at least human ones) cannot safely coexist with cyclists or pedestrians unless there are actual physical obstacles between moving traffic and everyone else.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by saelthavron on Sunday April 26, 2026 @05:59PM (#47915117)
Wouldn't it be safer for the bikers and people exiting on the bike lane side of the car if the bike lane was blocked?
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by gpm on Sunday April 26, 2026 @09:16PM (#47916686)
No. Cars entering the bike lane is dangerous. Bicycles being encouraged to enter the car lane to avoid the car illegally blocking it is dangerous.

The car stopping in car lane, far enough from the bike lane that its doors won't enter it, and letting the passengers out into the road, is by far the safest. Yes, that means now-pedestrians end up crossing the bike lane. That's a lot better than a car. They move slower, and more predictably, while simultaneously not blocking it for long enough that anyone is motivated to deke (my spellchecker doesn't like that? Is that a word outside Canada?) out into traffic.

Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by cwillu on Sunday April 26, 2026 @10:13PM (#47917005)
It's a canadian term from hockey, derived from decoy. I'm mildly-but-darkly amused at the notion of a cyclist needing to fake out a car trying to check them though :)
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by bradleyjg on Sunday April 26, 2026 @06:03PM (#47915156)
And then bicyclists will hit the people crossing to the side walk.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by petre on Monday April 27, 2026 @12:02AM (#47917579)
Bicycles have bells and brakes, you know. And cycling commuters have eyes to see opening car doors. It's also more difficult to use your phone on a bike and Japan has new laws regarding that.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by bradleyjg on Monday April 27, 2026 @08:51AM (#47920939)
I’m definitely aware they have bells. Evidence for breaks is much thinner on the ground.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by fc417fc802 on Sunday April 26, 2026 @06:18PM (#47915308)
That works for taxis but not for deliveries.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by spankalee on Sunday April 26, 2026 @06:47PM (#47915575)
Delivery drivers should find parking. They should be fined heavily for parking in traffic, including bike lanes.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by seanmcdirmid on Sunday April 26, 2026 @06:57PM (#47915684)
That’s not even close to how dense cities work. Even if you have street parking, it’s often saturated, this is like saying delivery drivers should just deliver in the middle of the night or something. Or really should go with small delivery drones.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by fc417fc802 on Sunday April 26, 2026 @07:21PM (#47915904)
I'd actually agree that they ought to deliver in the middle of the night but indeed that's just not how the world currently works. Far worse than bike lanes I've regularly seen large box trucks driven up onto particularly wide stretches of sidewalk in areas with skyscrapers. Law enforcement doesn't seem to care, presumably because how else are they supposed to get packages to where they need to be?
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by seanmcdirmid on Sunday April 26, 2026 @08:10PM (#47916253)
NYC used to (or still?) enforced strictly parking violations by delivery companies. But they did it so evenly the companies just considered it a cost of doing business, and raised their rates accordingly. Not violating the law and still being in the business wasn’t an option, so no competitor could undercut the other by following the rules and not paying the fine.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by jasomill on Sunday April 26, 2026 @10:28PM (#47917080)
Sounds like a scenario where something other than fines should be applied. Revoke plates fleetwide, tow any delivery trucks caught on the street with a mandatory 72 hour minimum impound time, with no access to the contents of the vehicle. And so on.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by seanmcdirmid on Monday April 27, 2026 @12:35AM (#47917734)
I don't think NYC wanted to basically ban the delivery companies like that, then the public would complain, so it was convenient fiction to have them fined and pass on the costs. Again, this is more of a "you can't do that but we don't have an actual solution so do it anyways" situation, not a "we aren't enforcing our rules strictly enough" problem.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by fc417fc802 on Monday April 27, 2026 @06:58PM (#47928449)
If Amazon then started marking packages as delayed with a video of the truck being towed I imagine the voters would quickly "fix" the enforcement "problem" in the delivery companies' favor.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by gpm on Sunday April 26, 2026 @09:20PM (#47916701)
In dense cities deliveries to front doors shouldn't be done by cars, yes. They take up too much space and cause too much inconvenience. For dense-deliveries (e.g. mail) park legally and walk some sort of cart along the sidewalk for blocks. For sparse-deliveries (e.g. food) ebikes work great. For medium density (e.g. puroloator) cargo-ebikes at least greatly increase the number of out of the way spots you can park.

Larger scale deliveries (e.g. to malls, grocery store, factories) should have a privately owned off-road, built into the structure place for trucks to park and drop things off. Though things like factories often simply don't belong in the dense part of the city.

Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by seanmcdirmid on Monday April 27, 2026 @12:47AM (#47917795)
This is pretty idealistic. What winds up happening around me is the amazon guy parks their car in the middle of the road AND also has a cart to hit multiple houses at the same time in that region. Furniture deliveries or even moving trucks can block our street for 30 minutes at a time. It is almost as bad as garbage day (ya, you aren't getting through our street on Tuesday morning if you time it wrong).

This would all be solved if we just had delivery parking spaces and got rid of on street parking for everyone else. Really, just that part is just where everything falls apart quickly. This is why traffic seems so much better in Europe (at least where I've lived, like in Switzerland), deliveries work, cars are not parked on the street except at a few very expensive parking spaces.

Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by gpm on Monday April 27, 2026 @01:05AM (#47917878)
I was basically describing how most deliveries happen where I live. Not all, and we could do with forcing the remainder to less disruptive means, but the significant majority.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by fc417fc802 on Monday April 27, 2026 @06:54PM (#47928415)
> if we just had delivery parking spaces and got rid of on street parking for everyone else.

The complaint I keep seeing is one of public subsidy. So you're suggesting we subsidize deliveries but not general parking? (To be clear I think it's all just anti-car absurdity.)

Of course merely repurposing a few spots to "commercial deliveries only" every few blocks would probably work. I've seen that done in a few places. I think it comes down to a planning and administration failure.

Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by seanmcdirmid on Monday April 27, 2026 @11:07PM (#47930067)
I am claiming we should subsidize short term drop off/pick up use of limited street front space (not just deliveries, but ride share/taxi pickup/dropoff also) rather than waste it on someone parking their car for 72 hours because they can't be bothered to pay for a parking space.

But ya, if you want to roll back car use, you can do that fastest by restricting free parking. Your community better be prepared for that with adequate public transit investments. Better to just roll back free parking slowly while ramping up public transit investments, but America always messes it up one way or the other.

Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by jasomill on Sunday April 26, 2026 @10:22PM (#47917054)
Or delivery drivers should ride bikes. And larger deliveries should be scheduled around low traffic times, or else the city should reserve parking for delivery trucks.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by socalgal2 on Sunday April 26, 2026 @06:26PM (#47915399)
Waymo consistently stops in No Stopping zones.
Re:Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike... by No1 on Monday April 27, 2026 @03:35PM (#47926261)
> Blocking the right car lane for a drop off is perfectly legal outside of No Stopping zones.

In which municipality? In most cities and states in the US, it is illegal to obstruct a roadway. Taxis may get some carve-outs for loading and unloading disabled people, but usually, even taxis are supposed to pull over before stopping for a passenger.