Show HN submissions tripled and now mostly have the same vibe-coded look

Re:Show HN submissions tripled and now mostly have the same ... by vunderba on Wednesday April 22, 2026 @11:52AM (#47865413)

I could see that. I’ve found that the more specificity you add to your prompt and less freedom you give Claude Code to kind of just “do its own thing”, the better your results will be.

FWIW, there’s also an official frontend-design skill for CC [1]. A while back I incorporated some of the more relevant guidance from WCAG into it [2].

[1] - https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/main/plugins/...

[2] - https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN submissions tripled and now mostly have the same ... by satvikpendem on Wednesday April 22, 2026 @11:55AM (#47865453)

There are accessibility skills as well:

https://github.com/airowe/claude-a11y-skill

https://mcpmarket.com/tools/skills/accessibility-checker

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN submissions tripled and now mostly have the same ... by conception on Wednesday April 22, 2026 @10:19PM (#47871637)

Note guidance for 4.7 specifically calls out being more specific compared to 4.6. Though the system prompt seems to say the opposite.

Tldr I would expect different outcomes with 4.7 with not being specific.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN submissions tripled and now mostly have the same ... by vunderba on Wednesday April 22, 2026 @10:45PM (#47871773)

Honestly I'd heard so much seemingly conflicting information about the quality of 4.7 that I've got an override in CC to stay on Opus 4.6 (1 million token context) for the time being.

For reference, in the .claude/settings.local.json

  {
    "model": "claude-opus-4-6[1M]"
  }

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN submissions tripled and now mostly have the same ... by classified on Thursday April 23, 2026 @03:59AM (#47873250)

Yes, you have to enjoy micromanaging a machine to get somewhat acceptable results.

[ Parent | on HN ]