News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenAI Livestream: ChatGPT Images 2.0 by zulban on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @06:55PM (#47855824)
Nobody can be bothered to make my cat out of Lego and the size of mount Everest but if an AI did I'd sure love to see it.

Your quip is pithy but meaningless.

Re:OpenAI Livestream: ChatGPT Images 2.0 by Gigachad on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @07:05PM (#47855961)
I'm not saying it's worthless for yourself, it's worthless to me as a viewer. AI content is great for your own usage, but there is no point posting and distributing AI generation.

I could have generated my own content, so just send the prompt rather than the output to save everyone time.

Re:OpenAI Livestream: ChatGPT Images 2.0 by dolebirchwood on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @08:00PM (#47856608)
And when the distilled knowledge/product is the result of multiple prompts, revisions, and reiterations? Shall we send all 30+ of those as well so as to reproduce each step along the way?
Re:OpenAI Livestream: ChatGPT Images 2.0 by zulban on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @11:49PM (#47858718)
Maybe reread my comment. Would you not want to see a mount Everest sized Lego cat? Even if it were my cat?

Again - your quip sounds good but when you think about it, it's flatly wrong.

Re:OpenAI Livestream: ChatGPT Images 2.0 by Fraterkes on Wednesday April 22, 2026 @05:04AM (#47860973)
This doesn't make sense, if I want to see a lego-cat slopimage I can just prompt a model myself (and have it be of my own cat). There's no reason for you to be involved in any part of that process, because the point of this stuff is that you are not doing anything.
Re:OpenAI Livestream: ChatGPT Images 2.0 by zulban on Wednesday April 22, 2026 @05:32PM (#47869555)
The claim is that people don't / shouldn't want to see something if humans can't be bothered to make it. I provided a counter example. So the claim is nonsense.