News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Less human AI agents, please by xeyownt on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @11:12AM (#47849959)
What a poor explanation.

With the same reasoning, human being are only a bunch of atoms, and the only reason they don't collide with other humans is because of the atomic force.

When your abstraction level is too low, it doesn't explain anything, because the system that is built on it is way too complex.

Re:Less human AI agents, please by chrisjj on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @11:18AM (#47850050)
"Autocomplete" is noy an abstraction level. It is the actual programmed behaviour.
Re:Less human AI agents, please by rcxdude on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @12:19PM (#47850940)
At a certain level of abstraction, yes.
Re:Less human AI agents, please by Jtarii on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @03:00PM (#47852992)
You can't understand human behaviour by reading a physics textbook.
Re:Less human AI agents, please by chrisjj on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @03:08PM (#47853100)
Of course not. One of the major differences between intelligent and word-guessing autocomplete.
Re:Less human AI agents, please by Jtarii on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @08:21PM (#47856859)
Do you think you could explain all AI behaviour by reading a physics textbook?
Re:Less human AI agents, please by chrisjj on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @09:08PM (#47857363)
Nope. But someone smart enough could.
Re:Less human AI agents, please by zingar on Wednesday April 22, 2026 @04:55AM (#47860909)
How the neural networks produce such surprisingly human characteristics is an open question with a ton of research going into it. Explaining this is a bit more than what one smart person can achieve.