Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
by horacemorace on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @06:27PM
(#47682146)
Because questions like this force us to hold up a very uncomfortable mirror to ourselves. It’s much easier to just dismiss.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
by woeirua on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @06:33PM
(#47682205)
I’m pretty close to the point of saying that human intelligence is not special.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
by wyre on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @08:11PM
(#47682997)
I would argue the opposite. It’s gotten us to a point were we can recreate human intelligence from electricity and a bunch of math!
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
by woeirua on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @09:04PM
(#47683432)
Are you a bot?
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
by wyre on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @03:24PM
(#47695029)
No of course not
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
by komali2 on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @01:38AM
(#47685776)
Despite the stupendous amount of evidence to the contrary?
So far no evidence has been detected in space or on earth, for all of history, of anything being intelligent in the way humans are.
One certain outcome of the Fermi Paradox: humans are outstandingly unique, according to all available evidence, which is the only measure that matters.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
by FeepingCreature on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @04:50AM
(#47687249)
Seems like that's more to do with human intelligence being first.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
by woeirua on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @06:32PM
(#47682196)
Some people at my office still confidently state that LLMs can’t think. I’m fairly convinced that many humans are incapable of recognizing non-human intelligence. It would explain a lot about why we treat animals the way we do.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
by not_that_d on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @02:17AM
(#47686053)
That depends on what you call "Think" we made the interface of LLM of the second "L", Language. And it can hack our perspective of the thing.
But in general, yeah, I agree, I think they would think it was a sentient, conscious, emotional being. And then the question is - why do we not think that now?
As I said, I don't have a particularly strong opinion, but it's very interesting (and fun!) to think about.