Can you define what you mean when you use the word “women” here?

My understanding is that these are males.

Like most things in biologicy, categorization is a nightmare unless you have a very specific use case in mind. In this case I'm talking about women phenotypically and socially (including self-identity) and especially athletes assigned female at birth. These women are clearly not just "males".

As far as I understand the ontology of human phenotype, it is unchanged by use of cross-sex hormone therapy.

I'm barred from the Olympics, due to my too short legs and flat-footedness, for the high jump event.

We can fix this, we have the technology. A pair of spring boots should do the trick.

To be fair, that could be said of many other medical conditions as well, especially chromosomal abnormalities such as Down Syndrome. Many humans, from the moment they are born and through no fault of their own, have virtually no hope of ever competing in the Olympics let alone winning, just because at such competitive extremes, any significant genetic disadvantage takes you out of the running.