News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by adgjlsfhk1 on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @06:34PM (#47524194)
The whole point of AGI is "general" intelligence, and for that intelligence to be broadly useful it needs to exist within the context of a human centric world
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by causal on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @06:56PM (#47524389)
Then why deny it a harness it can also use in a human centric world?
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by getnormality on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @09:18PM (#47525603)
There is no general purpose harness.
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by scotty79 on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @07:44PM (#47524857)
General intelligence not owning retinas.

Denying proper eyesight harness is like trying to construct speech-to-text model that makes transcripts from air pressure values measured 16k times per second, while human ear does frequency-power measurement and frequency binning due to it's physical construction.

Re:ARC-AGI-3 by Marha01 on Thursday March 26, 2026 @01:49AM (#47527008)
Does this mean blind people are not intelligent?
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by degamad on Thursday March 26, 2026 @03:55AM (#47527742)
Blind people do function within the context of a human-centric world, though, so they would qualify as intelligent.
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by Marha01 on Thursday March 26, 2026 @11:31AM (#47531763)
Yes, but they use various "harnesses" to do so (dog guides, text to speech software, assistance of other humans when needed..). Why can't AI?
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by Rastonbury on Thursday March 26, 2026 @06:44PM (#47536793)
Assistance of other humans? You do realise we're talking about an intelligence test right, at that point what are you even testing for. I'm sure you've taken exams where you couldn't bring your own notes, use Google or get help from someone, even though real life doesn't have those constraints