Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by cwmoore on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @04:14PM
(#47522553)
Or assign responsibility to…parents and legal guardians…who are not children.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by timmg on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @04:15PM
(#47522566)
Doesn't this lawsuit (essentially) prove otherwise?
Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by fdgfikgfv on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @04:26PM
(#47522697)
It would work if parents had legal course to seek justice against corporations that stalk, groom, and manipulate their children against their wishes.
Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by nkrisc on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @05:06PM
(#47523276)
Meta is not blameless here. Responsibility can be shared when Meta (and others) are essentially preying on children. It’s an uphill battle for parents by Meta’s design.
Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by cwmoore on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @05:36PM
(#47523607)
They’re not Meta’s kids, they’re freemium customers.
Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by hnlmorg on Thursday March 26, 2026 @01:56PM
(#47533605)
Sure, parents do bear some responsibility here too. But we are talking about a platform that is engineered to be addictive to adults too. So it’s not as if the platform isn’t still predatory even if we find a way to parent every child on the internet.