Re:Open source isn't a tip jar – it's time to charge for access
by chuckadams on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @10:13AM
(#47517631)
And if the penny isn't paid, no source? Then it's not open source. And practically speaking, no one will pay that.
Re:Open source isn't a tip jar – it's time to charge for access
by amelius on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @10:27AM
(#47517804)
If the penny isn't paid, they can still have the source.
But their legal department will have a problem.
I hope you understand the point now.
Re:Open source isn't a tip jar – it's time to charge for access
by chuckadams on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @11:30AM
(#47518718)
Going after them with legal claims is an odd definition of "can".
Re:Open source isn't a tip jar – it's time to charge for access
by amelius on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @12:24PM
(#47519521)
Nobody is going after them.
And remember this is only for enterprises.
Re:Open source isn't a tip jar – it's time to charge for access
by TheNewsIsHere on Thursday March 26, 2026 @05:32PM
(#47536064)
This does require large players acting in good faith.
Or, at best, competently.
Sometimes both of those, or neither, are in evidence.
But I like the way you think. Make it a contract performance issue for legal teams to police internally.
For 1 cent, we can still call it "free" even as in beer, the amount is small enough for that to be fair.