Re:Diverse perspectives on AI from Rust contributors and mai...
by Kerrick on Sunday March 22, 2026 @07:43PM
(#47483578)
Why would anybody who rejects them on moral grounds pick them up later? It isn't a discussion of lateness, it's a discussion of opting out.
Re:Diverse perspectives on AI from Rust contributors and mai...
by shimman on Sunday March 22, 2026 @08:34PM
(#47483992)
Asking it to do something isn't exactly complicated. At the very least, it's way easier than actually coding so why would you expect people to struggle with writing? There's no skill required in using LLMs, that's kinda the point.
Re:Diverse perspectives on AI from Rust contributors and mai...
by olalonde on Sunday March 22, 2026 @09:25PM
(#47484356)
The point is that people who reject them on moral grounds won't be using them, irrespective of whether they are easy to use.
Re:Diverse perspectives on AI from Rust contributors and mai...
by archagon on Monday March 23, 2026 @04:52AM
(#47486858)
Someone might feel different about a (future) community owned and managed LLM than one controlled by Altman, Musk, and similar. It would be nice to feel like we're building something together instead of funding the oligarchy and accelerating the collapse of civilization.
I strongly doubt that is going to be the case - picking up these tools is not rocket science, even if you want to be able to use them fairly effectively. In addition, there is so much churn in AI tooling these days that an early investment might not really be worth a lot in the longer run.
On the other hand, hands-on experience in programming and architecture is currently a must-have to use the tools effectively - and continuing without AI in the short term might just buy an inexperienced engineer some time to learn, and postpone skill atrophy for an experienced engineer.
Of course, who can know what the future looks like, but I doubt a "wait and see" approach is that dangerous to anyone's career.