Re:Bucketsquatting is (finally) dead
by arielweisberg on Friday March 13, 2026 @12:52PM
(#47366815)
This can be implemented without storing it. They could store a hash. No idea what they actually do.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bucketsquatting is (finally) dead
by charcircuit on Friday March 13, 2026 @01:03PM
(#47366954)
A hash of a public identifier like an email is personally identifiable data.
Isn’t the entire point of a cryptographically secure hash that you can’t derive the original information?
Re:Bucketsquatting is (finally) dead
by charcircuit on Friday March 13, 2026 @02:11PM
(#47367675)
You can't derive the original better than guessing. With public identifiers you can just take a list of them and guess with those. If someone asks for your email they can hash it themselves and compare it against whatever databases.
You can always encrypt with a public key instead of hashing.
You mean 'as well as', right?