News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Medical journal says the case reports it has published fo... by helsinkiandrew on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @11:23AM (#47249790)
> The articles usually start with a case description followed by “learning points” that include statistics, clinical observations and data from CPSP.

I can see the reason where fictional cases could be used here as teaching aid - based on real cases/ilnesses but simplified to make the learning points succinctly, but surely if the cases are being cited elsewhere someone should have raised the issue earlier?

Re:Medical journal says the case reports it has published fo... by SiempreViernes on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @11:47AM (#47250213)
Since it was for teaching I expect the case studies were always showing typical features of real cases, so there's nothing in the case vignette itself to give it away unless the author picks a funny name or something like that.

Rather it would be the entire form of these short highlight articles that would make you keep searching for a proper citation, unless you're lazy or pressed for time.

Re:Medical journal says the case reports it has published fo... by ultropolis on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @12:13PM (#47250623)
Wouldn't citing actual cases be a HIPAA violation? I can see why they would invent example cases, based on real ones, especially if they are fairly pedestrian cases.

I mean. Except if your pedestrian example does not reflect reality, then that is bad.

Re:Medical journal says the case reports it has published fo... by reenorap on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @01:00PM (#47251305)
HIPAA is American, not Canadian.
Re:Medical journal says the case reports it has published fo... by fc417fc802 on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @01:38PM (#47251867)
It's a privacy violation to reveal information that identifies the patient. It is not a violation (and is extremely common) to recount details without noting names, places, or even dates. Unless you already have access to a database of records you won't be able to track it down.

It's even common during talks to display diagnostic images that have had any identifying marks redacted.