News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Medical journal says the case reports it has published fo... by fc417fc802 on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @01:38PM (#47251867)
It's a privacy violation to reveal information that identifies the patient. It is not a violation (and is extremely common) to recount details without noting names, places, or even dates. Unless you already have access to a database of records you won't be able to track it down.

It's even common during talks to display diagnostic images that have had any identifying marks redacted.

There are no comments on this comment yet.