Re:AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court decl...
by minimaxir on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @11:03AM
(#47234430)
The original comment is asking from a legal perspective in a very specific example, not an emotional one.
Re:AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court decl...
by Ajakks on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @12:40PM
(#47235902)
They are describing the artistic qualities that something must posess to be actual artwork - which is relevant to copyrighting artworks, and is also that had been discussed, by Artists and Creators - the entire time
They did not write an emotional comment, they were trying to teach you, bc they ascertained that you don't understand art.
They were right.
Re:AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court decl...
by charcircuit on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @02:32PM
(#47237648)
>use of AI slop to prompt "give me a grayscale image of a mountain"
That is not the prompt I included in my post. The prompt I gave was for taking an the same photo you would be putting into photoshop and using AI to apply grayscale.
In short, your inability to understand photography doesn't justify the use of AI slop to prompt "give me a grayscale image of a mountain" and assume that it's the same thing as a human being taking an actual photo. They're not even close to the same thing.