News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court declines review). Parent comment

Re:AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court decl... by minimaxir on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @11:03AM (#47234430)
The original comment is asking from a legal perspective in a very specific example, not an emotional one.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court decl... by Ajakks on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @12:40PM (#47235902)
They are describing the artistic qualities that something must posess to be actual artwork - which is relevant to copyrighting artworks, and is also that had been discussed, by Artists and Creators - the entire time

They did not write an emotional comment, they were trying to teach you, bc they ascertained that you don't understand art.

They were right.

[ Parent | on HN ]