News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MicroGPT Explained Interactively by danhergir on Sunday March 01, 2026 @07:45PM (#47212487)
I went through the article, and it makes sense to me that we're getting names as an output, but why doing so with names?
Re:MicroGPT Explained Interactively by growingswe on Sunday March 01, 2026 @09:02PM (#47212997)
Names is just a random problem to demonstrate the model. It could be anything, I believe
Re:MicroGPT Explained Interactively by danhergir on Monday March 02, 2026 @11:04AM (#47219739)
What if you just use words
Re:MicroGPT Explained Interactively by aeve890 on Monday March 02, 2026 @06:37PM (#47225865)
Probably because names kinda obfuscate the ridiculous impracticality of this exercise. This microgpt can produce a random sequence of letters and by chance it might look like a name. If the thing output, let's say "Kianna" you just think "wow, it IS a name" but is it though? (Idk if it's a real name, at least not in Spanish) Isn't a normal word, so the randomness of names helps to hide the fact that this gpt just outputs random shit that looks like names. If you just use words you will get mostly random shit that doesn't resemble any real words. Just my hypothesis. I can see the convenience of using names. The output look like real names but you can achieve the same result with old ai and very basic algorithms.
Re:MicroGPT Explained Interactively by danhergir on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @09:40AM (#47233077)
in other words, it works well because it doesnt make out weird names.