It's not a point and click code machine, but it's laughably wrong to say they just churn out laughably wrong code.

Half of developers are below average. Half of developers say that the code Ai produces is amazing. Would you like a venn diagram?

You’re saying that AI is already good enough to replace 50% of developers. Sounds like you agree it will be very important.

He's saying the good half of developers have to deal with the increased slop output of the bad half. Probably will be overwhelmed by it, in the end.

It _can_ produce slop if people stop thinking. I've also seen it do just fine, when people know when, where and how to use it. That's the part that frightens me, not the code it makes itself.

I will have to bring out the Venn diagram.

Go ahead!

minor correction: they say AI produces code that is 'mostly' amazing.

Latest developer surveys (StackOverflow, DORA, DX, Pragmatic Engineer, etc.) show AI adoption up to 85 - 90%. Can you incorporate that into the venn diagram? ;-)

You're telling on yourself here

I guess everyone stopped using Claude Code already then, if it doesn't work.

It doesn't work precisely because people are using claude.

If it worked, there'd be no people using it.

Nobody goes there, it's too crowded.

"It's not revolutionary automation if every 'automator' has an operator attached" - doesn't take a Yogi to figure out...

sorry but this is just cope at this point

The copium is strong in these threads. There was merit to that a year or two ago, but at this point it's just sticking the head in the sand.