Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust
by throwaway2037 on Monday February 23, 2026 @08:28AM
(#47122050)
Fair point. What does Ladybird need to achieve in your opinion to shake the "hype" label? Honestly, I, myself, don't have a good answer!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust
by thrdbndndn on Monday February 23, 2026 @09:55AM
(#47123087)
To me, a project's "hype-ness" is the ratio of how much attention it gets over how useful it actually is to users.
As a browser, Ladybird usefulness is currently quite limited for obvious reasons. This is not meant to dismiss its achievements, nor to overlook the fact that building a truly useful browser for everyday users is something few open source teams can accomplish without the backing of a billion dollar company. Still, in its present state, its practical utility remains limited.
Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust
by shevy-java on Monday February 23, 2026 @02:54PM
(#47127831)
Good verdict. I agree.
Ladybird will have to deliver eventually - on this part I think many people agree with.
Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @03:01AM
(#47134219)
> As a browser, Ladybird usefulness is currently quite limited for obvious reasons
By this definition all basic research is hype.
No, not necessarily. It's the ratio and for most basic research the numerator of the fraction is also approaching zero.
Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @06:22AM
(#47135730)
Yes, necessarily. Basic research is currently useless in the same way building something that hasn’t been built is currently useless.
Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust
by pelagicAustral on Monday February 23, 2026 @08:37AM
(#47122150)
> What does Ladybird need to achieve in your opinion to shake the "hype" label?
A release (?)
Somehow people manage to run it without this magical release