News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Evaluating AGENTS.md: are they helpful for coding agents? by bootsmann on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @03:40AM (#47045102)
This reads a lot like bargaining stage. If agentic AI makes me a 10 times more productive developer, surely a 4% improvement is barely worth the token cost.
Re:Evaluating AGENTS.md: are they helpful for coding agents? by koiueo on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @03:54AM (#47045189)
> If agentic AI makes me a 10 times more productive

I'm not sure what you are suggesting exactly, but wanted to highlight this humongous "if".

Re:Evaluating AGENTS.md: are they helpful for coding agents? by zorked on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @03:58AM (#47045220)
There is now this whole subculture of dedicated .md writers that won't go away with some evidence.

The illusion of power and authority that LLMs give has deep psychological effects.

Re:Evaluating AGENTS.md: are they helpful for coding agents? by croes on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @04:32AM (#47045416)
10x is that quantity or quality?
Re:Evaluating AGENTS.md: are they helpful for coding agents? by Ragnarork on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @04:36AM (#47045444)
Also, "perceived" or "real"?
Re:Evaluating AGENTS.md: are they helpful for coding agents? by thesmart on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @05:53AM (#47149929)
Both
Re:Evaluating AGENTS.md: are they helpful for coding agents? by staticassertion on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @04:40AM (#47045467)
If something makes you 10x as effective and then you improve that thing by 4%...
Re:Evaluating AGENTS.md: are they helpful for coding agents? by zero_k on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @04:44AM (#47045494)
It's not only about the token cost! It's also my TIME cost! Much-much more expensive than tokens, it turns out ;)