News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by fulafel on Friday February 13, 2026 @12:51AM (#46999362)
Designing to tolerate the defects is well trodden territory. You just expect some rate of defects and have a way of disabling failing blocks.
Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by DeathArrow on Friday February 13, 2026 @01:55AM (#46999720)
So you shoot for 10% more cores and disable failing cores?
Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by joha4270 on Friday February 13, 2026 @02:38AM (#46999994)
More or less, yes. Of course, defects are not evenly distributed, so you get a lot of chips with different grades of brokenness. Normally the more broken chips gets sold off as lower tier products. A six core CPU is probably an eight core with two broken cores.

Though in this case, it seems [1] that Cerebras just has so many small cores they can expect a fairly consistent level of broken cores and route around them

[1]: https://www.cerebras.ai/blog/100x-defect-tolerance-how-cereb...

Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by jychang on Friday February 13, 2026 @02:35AM (#46999970)
Well, it's more like they have 900,000 cores on a WSE and disable whatever ones that don't work.

Seriously, that's literally just what they do.

Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by fulafel on Saturday February 14, 2026 @02:52AM (#47012571)
In their blog post linked in the sibling comment it says the raw number is 970k and they enable 900k (table at the end).