News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by zozbot234 on Friday February 13, 2026 @12:44AM (#46999315)
A first-gen Oxide Computer rack puts out max 15 kW of power, and they manage to do that with air cooling. The liquid-cooled AI racks being used today for training and inference workloads almost certainly have far higher power output than that.

(Bringing liquid cooling to the racks likely has to be one of the biggest challenges with this whole new HPC/AI datacenter infrastructure, so the fact that an aircooled rack can just sit in mostly any ordinary facility is a non-trivial advantage.)

Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by elcritch on Friday February 13, 2026 @03:10AM (#47000215)
Well for some. Google has been using liquid cooling to racks for decades.
Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by c0balt on Friday February 13, 2026 @07:19AM (#47001880)
> Bringing liquid cooling to the racks likely has to be one of the biggest challenges with this whole new HPC/AI

Are you sure about that? HPC has had full rack liquid cooling for a long time now.

The primary challenge with the current generation is the unusual increase of power density in racks. This necessitates upgrades in capacity, notably getting 10-20 kWh of heat away from few Us is generally though but if done can increase density.

Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by jmalicki on Friday February 13, 2026 @09:58AM (#47003443)
HPC is also not a normal data center but also usually doesn't have the scale of hyperscaler AI data centers either.
Re:GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark by mlyle on Friday February 13, 2026 @10:23AM (#47003717)
> The liquid-cooled AI racks being used today for training and inference workloads almost certainly have far higher power output than that.

75kW is a sane "default baseline" and you can find plenty of deployments at 130kW.

There's talk of pushing to 240kW and beyond...