Re:The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else
by fauigerzigerk on Sunday February 08, 2026 @08:03AM
(#46933858)
It's a political joke that uses a rhetorical sledge hammer to make it impossible to defend a particular principle. Is it so surprising that someone will still defend the principle?
Re:The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else
by charcircuit on Sunday February 08, 2026 @05:03AM
(#46932946)
It's not an obvious joke. It seems closer to a puzzle in that the reader must discover that the $100 was for entertainment. This is a common class of puzzle where money changes hands between two people and results in a surprising conclusion.
Re:The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else
by wiseowise on Sunday February 08, 2026 @07:01AM
(#46933522)
Bro, there’s something really wrong with your head if you seriously believe that the gist of the story is “eating shit is entertainment”.
Re:The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else
by charcircuit on Sunday February 08, 2026 @07:45AM
(#46933769)
A better gist may be the value of entertainment is temporary.
If instead it was just one person and they went to a movie theater. If you ignore the entertainment value it may just look like the person through away the admission cost.
Re:The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else
by satvikpendem on Sunday February 08, 2026 @07:54PM
(#46940295)
Why else would the economist offer the other to eat shit if not for entertainment? Like what other purpose would it reasonably be?
Re:The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else
by alfiedotwtf on Monday February 09, 2026 @04:10PM
(#46951371)
They don’t call it the dismal science for nothing!
Re:The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else
by satvikpendem on Monday February 09, 2026 @12:39AM
(#46941925)
More like not everyone agrees with the point of the joke. They didn't eat shit for nothing, the watching economist paid for the entertainment, why else would they have offered to pay to watch them if not for the entertainment? It's really no different to getting offered money to do a dare. The fact that they felt bad about it later is irrelevant, when the money was initially offered they both felt that they did get value from the act.
Has it occurred to you, especially since one of the economists in the joke admits they feel they ate shit for nothing, that they actually do not feel the exercise was worth it? Have you never spent money on something, thinking it would be worth it, then afterwards realised it was a waste of money? Have you also never taken a job and then realised “I didn’t charge enough for the trouble”?
I’m reminded of a bit of news I heard a while back, where one teenager challenged a friend to eat rat shit they found on the street. The eater died shortly after, because the poop contained rat poison. I doubt any of them found it worth it.