News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by ementally on Friday February 06, 2026 @12:08PM (#46915380)
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by pjmlp on Friday February 06, 2026 @12:19PM (#46915520)
To be expected, given how many organisations now require employees to use AI if they want to meet their OKRs, especially all that sell AI tools.
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by outofpaper on Friday February 06, 2026 @01:20PM (#46916225)
What's dumb, on top of everything, is needing to store non special standard operating procedures in specific AI folders and files when wanting to work with AI tooling.
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by WorldMaker on Friday February 06, 2026 @05:12PM (#46918842)
Copilot today supports the top-level AGENTS.md approach as well, which seems to be the cross-tool "standard".
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by int_19h on Saturday February 07, 2026 @01:39AM (#46921830)
It is a standard in a sense that they will all read it (although last I checked you still need to adjust the default config with Gemini). But feature support varies between different tooling. For example, only Claude supports @including other files.
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by WorldMaker on Saturday February 07, 2026 @02:12AM (#46921943)
The "standard" AGENTS.md suggestion for that is [regular markdown links](./like-this.md)
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by int_19h on Saturday February 07, 2026 @08:03PM (#46930227)
The problem is that it doesn't actually include the referenced file in the context. The model will only see what's in it if it deigns to read it, but that's not a given in all circumstances where it might need to.

I use this feature often in Claude to bring specific files so that they are in context at all times. E.g. when working on a parser, I will often put the grammar to be always in context. Or if working on a web app, all the model types.

Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by AlfeG on Saturday February 07, 2026 @11:47AM (#46925248)
Like needing to store IDE specific files?
[dead]
[dead]
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by llama052 on Friday February 06, 2026 @01:48PM (#46916562)
Both can be true.
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by embedding-shape on Friday February 06, 2026 @01:35PM (#46916408)
> Extremely simple changes do not require explicit unit tests.

I haven't used Copilot much, because people keep saying how bad it is, but generally if you add escape hatches like this without hard requirements of when the LLM can take them, they won't follow that rule in a intuitive way most of the time.

Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by pjmlp on Friday February 06, 2026 @04:08PM (#46918160)
It is kind of alright, I use mostly on VS when coding C# or C++, for code completions, error analysis, check code quality and such.

As agent, or writing everything for me, not yet.

Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by bwat49 on Friday February 06, 2026 @04:17PM (#46918257)
the $10 plan makes a great backup to claude or codex and the inline completions are nice
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by sandos on Friday February 06, 2026 @03:02PM (#46917438)
Yeah, I tried various very sane-looking instrucions file when starting to use copilot 6 months ago. Turned out it was not really useful. It mostly follows the rules anyway, but it also often forgot to. So turns out, especially with the fast turnaround with models today, it was better to just forego these instructions files.
Re:Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused librar... by viraptor on Saturday February 07, 2026 @12:30AM (#46921587)
It doesn't say much really. At this point we can assume almost every project has some generated code in it. Unless you're sure that every single author hates the idea and there are no external contributions. Agent configuration just makes it clear.