News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by crazygringo on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @08:18PM (#46894360)
It made sense in an age of print. But in the era of Wikipedia it's not really needed anymore. If you want population statistics or whatever, Wikipedia will tell you and link to the country's own official metrics. You don't need the CIA to collate it all for you.

And, as multiple commenters here have noted, it's on the Internet Archive. So let's just cherish it as another print tradition that would inevitably end.

Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by simonw on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @08:23PM (#46894393)
It hasn't been a print-first publication in many years - the site was updated weekly.

It's also where a lot of the facts on Wikipedia came from. This is a real loss.

I trust CIA over official population numbers from a lot of countries. There was a thread on here recently that pointed out a lot of countries haven't conducted an effective census in many years, if at all: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46810027

Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by stopbulying on Thursday February 05, 2026 @06:43AM (#46898602)
Hopefully the next admin will regain an understanding of the value of the World Facebook collection of somewhat-vetted facts and opinions.
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by shmeeed on Thursday February 05, 2026 @08:51AM (#46899633)
Please no World Facebook
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by stopbulying on Friday February 06, 2026 @07:34AM (#46912035)
What if they call theirs Truthbook Bader Ginsberg? Like RBGPAC
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by stopbulying on Saturday February 07, 2026 @02:54PM (#46927129)
(Truth Social went out of their way to copy the look of Twitter by styling their Mastodon instance with the Soapbox theme.)

(Elon Musk was the only contributor to a PAC that claimed to represent a deceased Supreme Court Justice.)

Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by edsu on Thursday February 05, 2026 @07:40AM (#46899001)
Yes, apart from the loss of the publication as a historical artifact, it is the loss of the continuing process that kept it up to date as a representation of the present (with whatever flaws you always have with such representations).
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by burnt-resistor on Thursday February 05, 2026 @12:10AM (#46895897)
> It made sense in an age of print.

Reading books is still important. That has nothing to do with the CIA factbook website edition.

Archiving copies of internet-published information is important, especially when a regime lies, tries to rewrite history, and destroys knowledge and public resources regularly.

> So let's just cherish it as another print tradition that would inevitably end

Self-fulfilling prophecy, learned-helplessness doomer fallacy. It only ended because some assholes ended it.

Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by jfengel on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @09:38PM (#46894951)
Wikipedia isn't a source. Wikipedia gathers data from elsewhere, including the World Factbook.

Wikipedia has other sources for most of that information. It comes from organizations like the UN, which the administration detests, and now lacks its own way of gathering that information.

Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by t-3 on Thursday February 05, 2026 @01:46AM (#46896504)
Wikipedia is nowhere near the same level of quality or trustworthiness.
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by techblueberry on Thursday February 05, 2026 @07:53AM (#46899104)
Start paying attention to references next time you look for a piece of factual information about a country.
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by crazygringo on Thursday February 05, 2026 @12:38PM (#46902209)
...I do?

A lot of stuff in Wikipedia doesn't have great references, but for the types of stats and facts in the World Factbook, it's generally quite excellent.