News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by simonw on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @08:23PM (#46894393)
It hasn't been a print-first publication in many years - the site was updated weekly.

It's also where a lot of the facts on Wikipedia came from. This is a real loss.

I trust CIA over official population numbers from a lot of countries. There was a thread on here recently that pointed out a lot of countries haven't conducted an effective census in many years, if at all: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46810027

Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by stopbulying on Thursday February 05, 2026 @06:43AM (#46898602)
Hopefully the next admin will regain an understanding of the value of the World Facebook collection of somewhat-vetted facts and opinions.
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by shmeeed on Thursday February 05, 2026 @08:51AM (#46899633)
Please no World Facebook
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by stopbulying on Friday February 06, 2026 @07:34AM (#46912035)
What if they call theirs Truthbook Bader Ginsberg? Like RBGPAC
Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by stopbulying on Saturday February 07, 2026 @02:54PM (#46927129)
(Truth Social went out of their way to copy the look of Twitter by styling their Mastodon instance with the Soapbox theme.)

(Elon Musk was the only contributor to a PAC that claimed to represent a deceased Supreme Court Justice.)

Re:Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell by edsu on Thursday February 05, 2026 @07:40AM (#46899001)
Yes, apart from the loss of the publication as a historical artifact, it is the loss of the continuing process that kept it up to date as a representation of the present (with whatever flaws you always have with such representations).