I was right about ATProto key management

Re:I was right about ATProto key management by tptacek on Sunday January 25, 2026 @06:54PM (#46759985)

Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I was right about ATProto key management by direwolf20 on Monday January 26, 2026 @08:33AM (#46765423)

Backseat moderating is also against the guidelines. If you believe the comment needs moderator attention, flag it. It's pretty ironic you can't say this rule without breaking it

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I was right about ATProto key management by tptacek on Monday January 26, 2026 @10:46AM (#46767079)

No it isn't.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I was right about ATProto key management by ramon156 on Monday January 26, 2026 @12:53PM (#46769040)

It's not a rule, but I'd like it to be

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I was right about ATProto key management by account42 on Monday January 26, 2026 @08:34AM (#46765438)

I wish there was a rule against rule lawyering. Those comments are way more annoying than gp. (queue recursive replies)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I was right about ATProto key management by dxdm on Monday January 26, 2026 @09:22AM (#46765967)

I'd like to add to my sibling comments that this blog's design is so atrocious for its readability that it deserves to be called out.

In fact, I'd like for such a comment to be at the top here, so that I can decide to avoid following the link until I have read enough comments to determine whether it's worth it.

[ Parent | on HN ]