Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels
by barney54 on Thursday January 22, 2026 @01:31PM
(#46723282)
That’s because net metering is a transfer from people who can’t afford solar to the rich people who can. https://energyathaas.wordpress.com/2024/04/22/californias-ex...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels
by triceratops on Thursday January 22, 2026 @01:35PM
(#46723341)
Which is true. But it's a rug pull for people who spent money on their panels expecting an RoI. Were existing installations grandfathered in?
Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels
by throwworhtthrow on Thursday January 22, 2026 @01:53PM
(#46723573)
Yes, existing installations get 20 years of grandfathered rates [1].
Which makes it more of a ladder pull than a rug pull...
[1] https://www.sce.com/clean-energy-efficiency/solar-generating...
Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels
by direwolf20 on Thursday January 22, 2026 @02:01PM
(#46723654)
That's fine. If we have enough X then stop paying people to build more X.
Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels
by direwolf20 on Thursday January 22, 2026 @07:24PM
(#46726870)
Late thought: we continue to reward those who built more X when we needed more X, and that's fine too.
Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels
by Analemma_ on Thursday January 22, 2026 @03:00PM
(#46724434)
The first round of people paid way more for their solar panels though, and those higher prices helped bootstrap the industry. Should people who paid much less for panels get the same reward? I'm having trouble getting outraged about this, it seems to be incentives working exactly as they should.
Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels
by throwworhtthrow on Thursday January 22, 2026 @03:12PM
(#46724568)
I agree, and maybe my "ladder pull" comment comes off as too negative. Most early solar buyers were either in it for environmental reasons or for a modest return on investment. I don't think many were expecting a windfall.