News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude's New Constitution by jychang on Thursday January 22, 2026 @03:30AM (#46716617)
Yeah, that was tried. It was called GPT-4.5 and it sucked, despite being 5-10T params in size. All the AI labs gave up on pretrain only after that debacle.

GPT-4.5 still is good at rote memorization stuff, but that's not surprising. The same way, GPT-3 at 175b knows way more facts than Qwen3 4b, but the latter is smarter in every other way. GPT-4.5 had a few advantages over other SOTA models at the time of release, but it quickly lost those advantages. Claude Opus 4.5 nowadays handily beats it at writing, philosophy, etc; and Claude Opus 4.5 is merely a ~160B active param model.

Re:Claude's New Constitution by kouteiheika on Thursday January 22, 2026 @04:11AM (#46716858)
> and Claude Opus 4.5 is merely a ~160B active param model

Do you have a source for this?

Re:Claude's New Constitution by jychang on Thursday January 22, 2026 @07:41AM (#46718480)
> for Claude Opus 4.5, we get about 80 GB of active parameters

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46039486

This guess is from launch day, but over time has been shown to be roughly correct, and aligns with the performance of Opus 4.5 vs 4.1 and across providers.

Re:Claude's New Constitution by WarmWash on Thursday January 22, 2026 @09:31AM (#46719688)
Maybe you are confused, but GPT4.5 had all the same "morality guards" as OAI's other models, and was clearly RL'd with the same "user first" goals.

True, it was a massive model, but my comment isn't really about scale so much as it is about bending will.

Also the model size you reference refers to the memory footprint of the parameters, not the actual number of parameters. The author postulates a lower bound of 800B parameters for Opus 4.5.