News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:After 25 years, Wikipedia has proved that news doesn't ne... by komali2 on Saturday January 17, 2026 @07:38AM (#46657592)
The use of the masculine pronoun here when we're referring to someone who transitioned from male kind of gives away that you're probably less concerned with searchability and preservation of history, and more concerned with promoting a transphobic agenda. I suppose it's possible you were using it as a generic pronoun, but in that case I would have expected "they." Am I wrong?
Re:After 25 years, Wikipedia has proved that news doesn't ne... by eimrine on Saturday January 17, 2026 @10:04AM (#46658593)
Your statement can be reversed amasingly. It is easier to proof that it is your side of frontline who does not care about searchability than what you have said. And therefore it is easire to suspect you in promoting an old Klaus Schwabbe's fairytale about DEI missvalues. There are no reasons of calling one person as "they" because we use to call a person who will always have hairs on his face as "male".
Re:After 25 years, Wikipedia has proved that news doesn't ne... by komali2 on Saturday January 17, 2026 @11:58AM (#46659601)
So, you don't think I'm wrong? The OP used "he" because they have a transphobic agenda?

> because we use to call a person who will always have hairs on his face as "male".

We may not have solved the question, "what is a woman," but you have brilliantly solved the question, "what is a man": a human with eyebrows.

Re:After 25 years, Wikipedia has proved that news doesn't ne... by eimrine on Saturday January 17, 2026 @01:03PM (#46660285)
If someone uses "he" word it does not means antitransism. My point is that trying to euphemize "he" word is anistraightism. And I am even not an antigayist.

If your words can be reversed so easily it means that you have no idea but a pure propaganda instead. Famous anti-white-straight-man-ism seems as a dangerous thing to me, so I oppose this unfamous Davos-protracted diversity woke ideology.

Re:After 25 years, Wikipedia has proved that news doesn't ne... by komali2 on Saturday January 17, 2026 @01:24PM (#46660492)
We're talking about the male pronoun used in the context of a discussion of a trans woman, not some kind of men's rights thing. Did you think I was arguing that saying "he" is bad because all men are evil or something? That's how faithless your interpretation of the arguments of non transphobic people has become?

Can you define "woke?"

Re:After 25 years, Wikipedia has proved that news doesn't ne... by eimrine on Saturday January 17, 2026 @01:33PM (#46660584)
I think you are saying that "he" because you support woke ideology. It is clearly visible since you were talking about trans values also.

If you need me to repeat - I will repeat: I am not antigayist and I am not anti-transist.

Woke is essentually anti-nationalism and anti-white-suppremacism.

Re:After 25 years, Wikipedia has proved that news doesn't ne... by komali2 on Saturday January 17, 2026 @09:40PM (#46664345)
> Woke is essentually anti-nationalism and anti-white-suppremacism.

Then, depending on your definition of nationalism, it sounds like it's an unimpeachably good thing to be Woke, so I'm super confused where you're coming from here.

To be clear: I was saying that the OP was purposefully misgendering Nex Benedict in order express their transphobia.

Re:After 25 years, Wikipedia has proved that news doesn't ne... by eimrine on Sunday January 18, 2026 @08:57AM (#46667837)
Wake up, please. Noone else except of white suprematist will support your protransism, think about it. Analyze what nations typically are against it and who will protect you in the special place where you have written that comment when the yellows will come. It is OK to be transgender, but only while you are protected. White suprematists may protect transgender values but they need a freedom to be free from that kind of euphemization you are spreading.