What is the long-standing issue that you would be preventing though? It's creepy and wrong to be sure, but say banning a specific subreddit with that content, what is the result of that action?
With doxxing you have documented cases of people being harassed based on people finding out their true identity. So banning doxxing helps to prevent situations where people are harassed outside of the site for the things they do on the site.
And banning posting candid sexually suggestive photos of kids helps to prevent the subjects of the photos from getting harassed at school when someone finds the photos online. I don't see why that should be any less important than trying to prevent harassment of people who take and post those photos.
At least the person who gets harassed over posting the photos is getting harassed for something he actually deliberately did, whereas the kid might be getting harassed for accidentally showing some cleavage or some underwear. Or maybe it is ultimately the kid's fault for not dressing like a Saudi woman when in public.
Or you could just answer my question.
I was specifically not litigating the enforceability of "creepiness" standards.
For what it's worth: Watching anime isn't creepy. Two males kissing isn't creepy.
I don't what sense this rule would would make. As long as nobody can google it (since no name) no one is hurt. So what?
/edit
Or why the consent of a random 17 year old girl has more value that the consent of a random 20 year old guy working at a random CoS org.
- no sexual comments
- no kids
- no candid shots (where the subject is clearly not aware of the picture)
There's plenty of lines that could be drawn there. Various people have played stupid that no combination of these rules simply couldn't work, but this isn't a brand new problem no one has wondered about before.
So again, I don't see the equivalence.
(boy it's hard to post a URL with a ' in it)
People in public spaces can be photographed without their consent. That's a very clear rule, at least in the US. See: http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf
Because that is exactly what this is. A platform for the public humiliation of women who walk in public.
If we don't tolerate it for the guilty, why should we tolerate it for the innocent?