Reddit will not ban 'distasteful' content, chief executive says

Re:Reddit will not ban 'distasteful' content, chief executiv... by tptacek on Wednesday October 17, 2012 @12:53PM (#4665333)

I am drawing the line at compromising (sexualized, objectified, or deliberately embarrassing) photos of minors.

So again, I don't see the equivalence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit will not ban 'distasteful' content, chief executiv... by fosap on Wednesday October 17, 2012 @01:15PM (#4665460)

What is compromising? Photos of feet? Completely harmless to most people, for some better than tits. There is also a hair fetish. And probably there are a way more. Only post pictures of people wearing burkas?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit will not ban 'distasteful' content, chief executiv... by danielweber on Wednesday October 17, 2012 @01:25PM (#4665519)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loki%27s_Wager

(boy it's hard to post a URL with a ' in it)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit will not ban 'distasteful' content, chief executiv... by fosap on Wednesday October 17, 2012 @01:40PM (#4665604)

So, what does this tells us about photos of feet?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit will not ban 'distasteful' content, chief executiv... by tptacek on Wednesday October 17, 2012 @01:42PM (#4665618)

Photos of feet are fine.

[ Parent | on HN ]