News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Government drops plans for mandatory digital ID to work i... by everyday7732 on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @12:18PM (#46618878)
This line was particluarly interesting:

"... Labour MPs are growing increasingly frustrated with the government's U-turns.

Some had already been wary of defending controversial government policies to their constituents because they feared that the policy would inevitably be reversed."

which implies that the MPs are openly admitting that they don't state their personal opinions, merely parrot the party line, but are frustrated when they are required to abruptly change the things they claim to believe in.

What a farce. Members of parliament should have their OWN fucking views about things, and defend or debate those views on behalf of the people they represent.

Re:Government drops plans for mandatory digital ID to work i... by 9JollyOtter on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @01:01PM (#46619621)
That why they have party whips and threaten deselections for people that have their own ideas.

Many of these people would not be in Parliament if they weren't selected by the party. Most people vote for a party, not the MP. So why would it benefit the MP to have their own views when they can just parrot whatever they've been told to? It doesn't.

Re:Government drops plans for mandatory digital ID to work i... by throwaway85825 on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @01:26PM (#46620193)
The most ridiculous thing about UK politics is that there is zero residency requirement.
Re:Government drops plans for mandatory digital ID to work i... by 9JollyOtter on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @05:27PM (#46624673)
There is always something in the UK where I find out something utterly ridiculous is allowed, yet they are quite happy to legislate thousands of other things.
Re:Government drops plans for mandatory digital ID to work i... by OgsyedIE on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @12:24PM (#46618982)
Those people get deselected by the NEC.