Re:The Gleam Programming Language
by brandonpollack2 on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @11:47PM
(#46612454)
I really like the idea of gleam but I don't want to hand implement serialization for every type (even with an LSP action) in 2026.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Gleam Programming Language
by ocean_moist on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @12:04AM
(#46612537)
Biggest issue with this language. But... fairly trivial to implement codegen with gleam/glance[0]. No good libraries do this well right now (e.g. support for discriminated unions).
Re:The Gleam Programming Language
by worthless-trash on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @12:24AM
(#46612649)
I rarely serialise every type in my gleam code, My quick back of the napkin math is less than 5%.
Re:The Gleam Programming Language
by brandonpollack2 on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @06:51AM
(#46614994)
But 100 percent of projects writing the same stuff
Re:The Gleam Programming Language
by worthless-trash on Thursday January 15, 2026 @02:51AM
(#46629416)
I don't think anyone is serializing exactly the same stuff that i'm doing.
Re:The Gleam Programming Language
by virtualwhys on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @12:36AM
(#46612717)
Dart has the same glaring issue (yes, yes, you can use a codegen library but it's not the same).