Re:Iran has now been offline for 96 hours
by burnt-resistor on Monday January 12, 2026 @02:22PM
(#46592950)
And doesn't become another neoliberal, corrupt vassal state beholden to the IMF.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Iran has now been offline for 96 hours
by FergusArgyll on Monday January 12, 2026 @02:41PM
(#46593196)
Yeah, that sounds absolutely awful compared to what it's like to live in Iran now
Re:Iran has now been offline for 96 hours
by burnt-resistor on Monday January 12, 2026 @08:16PM
(#46596288)
False choice. Both are bad.
Nope. Your "horror scenario" would be a definite improvement. Both are bad, perhaps, but not equally bad.
Re:Iran has now been offline for 96 hours
by Aloisius on Monday January 12, 2026 @06:30PM
(#46595615)
The IMF is essentially a credit union with 191 member countries, so they'd become a vassal to most of the world - if by vassal, one means to agree to terms that might make it possible to repay loans.
Some (including quite a few neoliberals) want to abolish the IMF altogether, though I'm unsure if letting countries collapse completely is really a better option.
Re:Iran has now been offline for 96 hours
by burnt-resistor on Monday January 12, 2026 @08:25PM
(#46596341)
Lies. IMF isn't a charity. They come in and dictate policy and make money off misfortune. It's disaster capitalism.
Edit: See also. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shock_Doctrine